Is public education a breeding ground for liberal constituents?

So, Today while I was in the sauna I was reading a little Newsweek article condemning George Bush, and ironically enough the current president Obama as well. The main topic of this article which allowed Obama to be so chastised was his education policy and the striking similarities, to no child left behind. Now admittedly as with any Newsweek article, it had a left leaning spin and pushed more of the fault on Bush, but that is all beside the point. In the article there was a line that said that these programs instituted by the current and previous presidents, will destroy the public school system.
All I could say was don’t tease me Newsweek.
So okay, before you start getting upset and saying. This guy hates education blablablabla. Think about what the public education system has really, become.
So EVERY teacher belongs to the AFL-CIO, Why? They have too it’s pretty simple, want to teach? Join the union. Well we all know that the unions are in the pockets of the Left and the Left is in the pockets of the union so in a way the unionized left is a self-fulfilling entity.
So as any self-fulfilling entity, those who speak the company line the best and loudest, rise the highest. It’s the nature of the establishment. So the Democrat controlled unions, control teachers, which control students…thereby leading to millions of liberal brainwashing factories and nothing more.
So you are probably thinking that I am just blowing smoke, but let’s be real for a minute. Everyone knows about programs that allow students to go to different schools that are outside of the district, taking the money from the district into a different district, the same complaint that they voice of voucher program. Why is it not an issue for a student to go to a different program in a different district? Because the unions still get paid and it’s still the same union and as long as the union is paid it doesn’t matter.
So all in all, the public education system as it stands is a producer of liberal constituents.
Thanks for tuning in

Too Liberal To Be Functional

So before I begin I have to apologize for it being so long since my last post, but I wanted to discuss an Issue something of interest that has come into my mind. Since I have been going to my school, and been surrounded by liberals, and have seen the absolute level of dysfunctionalism among them It has made me beg the question; is it possible, to be too liberal to be functional?
I guess we should start with my hypothesis, and question what functionality is? I think functionality is being able to survive, reproduce, and provide. Does liberalism provide for any of those things?
I certainly don’t think so. Since I have been at school there has been a campaign for low carbon lunches. Within some of the calls for low carbon lunches were to eat less meat, eat only locally grown items, don’t buy anything out of season, don’t shop at Wal-Mart, you know the usual liberal none-sense. Well If you take it a step further, maybe we shouldn’t harvest crops using industrial vehicles, so I guess that means no grocery stores for the liberal elitists who propose this non-sense. Wait and cow flatulence causes greenhouse gas emissions so I guess we can’t eat meat either. So I guess that liberals advocate either we should all live on a farm, or that we should just not eat and die, or perhaps revert to a more primitive hunter-gatherer form of life. Totally dysfunctional
How about reproduction, I think that liberal reproductive ideology speaks for itself. After all families create optimum support for reproduction and not supporting a family neither properly supports reproduction nor does it properly provide for a family.
So the question, is it possible to be too liberal to be functional? The answer is yes!